General Question

Stinley's avatar

Is it better to be part of a big economic group than not?

Asked by Stinley (11525points) May 26th, 2016 from iPhone

Is it better to be part of a big economic group and have to conform to the rules of the group but gain the advantages of collective bargaining. Or is it better to follow your own rules but have a small economic power and less of a safety net? I’m thinking of Europe.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

5 Answers

Jak's avatar

There can never be just one answer because individuals occupy all strata of a group, therefore it would depend on ones relative position in said group.

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

Middle between both extremes. It’s a personal choice.

ibstubro's avatar

I agree with you that it’s better to conform and have the collective bargaining.

The biggest danger for England is the EU learning to make it’s way without the English bullying. Better that England continue to cry and whine and gnash it’s teeth at the burden EU membership puts on them, while calling an oversized portion of the shots.

johnpowell's avatar

So back in the day (when America was great) we had strong unions. Now they are decimated and we bitch about income inequality. There could be a pattern.

janbb's avatar

@johnpowell i thought of unions immediately too.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther