General Question

elbanditoroso's avatar

Is it good for America if Fox News' (so-called) talent leaves along with Roger Ailes?

Asked by elbanditoroso (33157points) July 20th, 2016

Roger Ailes, one of the big bosses at Fox news, may be canned in the next couple of days as a result of various sexual harassment complaints from Fox female employees. Most recently Gretchen Carlson went public with her allegations.

In the wake of this (and Ailes’ potential departure) there are news stories that some other Fox News ‘talent’ may leave if he does. (One can only speculate as to their rationale.)

My question is not about Ailes or the other news people, and it is not about sexual harassment.

My question is this: If Fox News – which has been a solid right wing broadcasting outlet – loses some of its right wing ‘talent’, does America benefit?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

10 Answers

ragingloli's avatar

The less far right demagogues, the better.

stanleybmanly's avatar

The thing that I will hand FOX is that there are a couple of folks among the on air talent that actually rise above the sleazy “standards” you grow to expect from the ministry of wingnut propaganda. Bret Baier, Chris Wallace and Greta Van Susteren are 3 capable journalists you can watch visibly struggle to maintain some semblance of integrity while mired in the muck. Shepard Fox is another who wisely took the route of being director for breaking news, and thereby avoid altogether blaring out “the message” These folks clearly are writing their own copy and combined are a study on maintaining standards while marooned in hell. The accusations against Ailes probably surprise no one. The suspiciously ample barnload of vacuous bimbo livestock, usually exhibited en masse, is hardly an enhancement on “the news” The bunch serves primarily as a sort of harpy chorus spewing that right wing bullshit. It isn’t really news that a repulsive man with money might assemble a harem of babes to harass sexually. It’s the oldest story in the book.

BellaB's avatar

I’m not sure that the messaging would change much. It is still a Murdoch operation.

imrainmaker's avatar

Sooner the better..

Buttonstc's avatar

@stanleybmanly

I think you mean Shep Smith (not Fox) and I agree with your assessment of him. When you listen to him, he’s objective, plays it straight down the middle (as a news broadcaster should) and not toeing the party line.

I don’t tune into enough Fox to hear much of the other two but I know that I don’t have to hold my nose while listening to Shep Smith.

I must admit I was surprised when Chris Wallace decided to sign on to Fox, but perhaps he wanted to go out of his way to distance himself from his father’s liberal pedigree.

I’m curious about why other Fox people woukd leave after Ailes. Are they protesting that he’s being canned (and thus endorsing sexual harrassment)?

What are they hoping to accomplish?

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

Oh, my god. I haven’t stopped laughing since this question was posted six hours ago.

Talent?

You call forgetting to take your meds Talent?

SmartAZ's avatar

Wait, what? Someone cares about Fox News? I gotta call my broker!

ibstubro's avatar

No!
The pretty bois and gurls hired to replace them will be even more clueless and irrational.

The insanity continues.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther