[NSFW] Is being boinkable important to women or just men and frat boys?

A day or so ago, someone linked this
, I read it, I find no information totally irrelevant, even some very fluffy ones. I wonder do women care of methods or scales like this or are they in denial of them because maybe they do not land on the so-called favorable end of the scale. When it comes down to it, no one is thinking of a 1–10 on personality when they see a woman at the company mixer standing by the hors-d’oeuvre (some will even have denial of that), the guys looking at her, or the women looking at him, are sizing up off visuals. I guess we can tell ourselves every women leave the house with all the war paint on just for themselves and not because they will be viewed by other people, more pointedly, men. I saw a show like 20/20 years ago where they did an experiment on looks and potential attractiveness. They had a fairly successful guy who was short and slightly balding, when they told potential dates he was of average income, not too many women were interested, but when it was leaked in conversation that he was a CEO and doing very well, more women were interested (strange, isn’t it? ~~). I guess they missed his million dollar personality thinking of his millions in the bank. So, with some men using a scale as to who is boinkable, not that they are good conversationalist, or great housekeepers, it kind of shows love lust at 1st sight has some traction over ”I don’t care what she looks like as long as she has a good personality”. Who will go on record to say any scale, or qualifier for sexual attractiveness has no importance to women it is a product of men or frat boys only?