@Kardamom… I’m not sure what this says about me, but obviously I am not much of a ‘Royal Watcher’ – I knew nothing of the notion that poor Harry might not be Charles’ kiddy! As it is, I’ve just looked at lots of images, to see what I can see. In answer to the last part of your question, it seems very unlikely that paternity would be sought to be proven, it would open the biggest can of worms… again! Us Brits are very tolerant of Royal activity on the whole. Except where victimisation is obvious, and where the possibility of Charles becoming King brings the awful prospect of Camilla… Who breaks all taboos…
I don’t agree that Harry is the spit of Hewitt, as it happens. His ears are definitely Royal, he resembles his uncle and actually is more like Diana in some ways than Wills. I think Di may have fancied Hewitt because he resembled her rellys!!!
Frankly, roll on the Royal Wedding! It’ll give all of us here in blighty something to gawp at, or to snootily (pretend posh) protest that we are above gawping. I for one am looking forward to a good gawp, to much posh commentary, too much opining about progeny, the dress, the future…
All in all, great entertainment all round. Or, ‘orl rind’ if you are posh.