@meiosis well said honey.
As to the question, she’s about to go join something we should have gotten rid of long, long ago, and to our US cousins, they aren’t quite so cute when you have to pay for them. Goodness, that sounds awfully sharp lol. I don’t mean it to, really i don’t, sorry honeys, but the royal leeches/family bug the hell out of me. When the present queen pops her clogs, it should be seen as a natural break and time to get shot of the lot of them.
We all had our rotas changed at work recently, and a bunch of us (all women) were sitting chatting in the break room about how we’ll work our new hours round life stuff in general and I’d said how lucky we were that we all got liberated lol :-) Actually though we are lucky, although the choice is not as clear cut as it might seem at first glance. None of us in the break room had a choice of whether to work or stay at home, we need to work to pay the bills, simple as that. Does that mean sisters who stay home are worth less because they don’t work outside the home? of course not. Raising children is an incredibly demanding job in itself, and you don’t get 4 weeks holiday and weekends off from it either.
hugglys xx
ps: @marinelife British people have not been “subjects” (subjected to the will of the monarch) for many, many, many years honey. They are figureheads and tolerated but the crown has no actual power, any power they had was removed for very good reason a long time ago. Being called a subject is incredibly insulting, although I know that you didn’t mean it like that <hugs> xx