@Luiveton
Can you please clarify? I’m afraid I am not at all clear on what you are saying. It’s not “wrong” to state that science explains phenomena that some religions have already tried to explain. It’s absolutely correct, in fact.
Science and religion are entirely different disciplines.
Science explains things by using theories to account for observed facts, then testing those theories to see if they are viable. If the theory doesn’t fit the facts, it’s discarded. Like all other theories, the theory of evolution has been tested in this way, and has so far passed every test. It’s as much a valid theory as germ theory or the theory of gravity.
Religions are belief systems. While they may have some accounts of how and why things happen, these accounts are not scientific theories. There are a great many explanations for things in the Bible, for example, that are simply not scientifically correct (for example, showing mating goats a streaked stick doesn’t lead to them having striped kids) . Religions aren’t meant to validate scientific theories. Not can religious beliefs be used to invalidate any scientific theory. Just because a religion doesn’t believe in a theory doesn’t mean that the theory is wrong. Only scientific testing can show that.
So, once again- what, specifically, do you think is incorrect about the theory of evolution?