When you spoke of the “wussification” of men, whatever the hell that means, you said “Right now society is approving of this, especially woman but there is going to be some serious backlash if men keep going this way.” That is, in part blaming women for the “wussification” of men, again, whatever the hell that means, because they are supporting it. You also said “You can’t have it both ways- the sensitive guy and the guy who will knock someone out of his shoes for bothering you at the shopping center.” I am assuming by “you” you mean woman.
Am I wrong? That women want men who are tough and will defend and protect them but also want them sensitive, but can’t have it both ways? And yes, sometimes we like that you are physically stronger than us and have our backs, who wouldn’t want that, but the idea that we want you to beat the crap out of someone at the mall for hitting on us to the point that there is blood, no, most of us don’t want that. And the idea, the implication than men are capable of only two modes: beating the bloody crap out of someone and being a wuss is an insult to men.
I’m the one who first made it a matter of fault or blame in response to something you said, so if you can clerify this I would appreciated it. But, then again, you were the one who claimed men didn’t never had “hissy fits” which is only a matter of perception and semantics and that men were somehow going down that very dangerous path towards “wussification.”