@silverfly, You’ve probably never experienced sarcasm in your life, I was merely being facetious.
The analogy with buying food (which is also heavily advertised and encouraged by the government as ‘healthy’), was a condensed “reductio ad absurdum” argument, demonstrating the, well, absurdity of your suggestion that those two properties of vaccinations are good reasons to reject them.
I find it difficult to believe you could misunderstand me so.
You are rejecting vaccination, because you suspect those encouraging it have ‘ulterior motives’.
I agree in one respect, the Establishment encourages it, solely because it is in their interest for us to live and serve them longer.
Not out of the goodness of their hearts.
That would just be silly.
Now, there are other things they encourage for exactly the same ulterior motive, such as eating healthy food, wearing seatbelts and not doing meth.
If you have issue with the Establishment’s ulterior motive, as you seem to, the best way to counter it would be to do the opposite of what they suggest, as you have done in one case.
Once we adopt your logic in every case, and we’re all dead, the Establishment will have no meaning, and their perfidious aims will have been averted.
If this is not your intention, why else would you reject it, and what relevance has the fact that it is widely available and encouraged as healthy?