IMO, no. A good picture’s worth a thousand words because it’s frozen in time and, if done well, the audience will peruse all the details, shading, nuances, emotions, contrasts and blends, etc. There’s more time invested, so more details will be noticed (and could become 1000 words)
Film is a completely different medium- it doesn’t give the audience time to stop and study the minute details and whatever interplay’s occurring in the picture. The story is primary and the things in the film are put there to convey the story. Photos and pictures are the other way around—the things, just by being what they are, convey a story. Of course, there’s some overlap.
Interestingly enough- back in the 1930’s and 40’s, film clips were much longer and gave the audience time to study the screen. Not so today. Our rhythm’s changing.