I don’t think they should be allowed to revote. They were told to begin with that if they held their elections early, that the results would not count. Those in charge, choose to disregard this, because they were trying to make a ‘statement’. They were disgruntled that their elections were held later and felt that they didn’t receive as much attention from candidates because of that, because they felt the party’s candidate was pretty much decided by the time their states got to vote. Well, they made their ‘statement’ they obviously didn’t forsee the ‘Obama’ factor. Also, as a side note, the states were told that they could hold a revote, however, the states would have to cover the additional expense, but the states wanted some one else to pay the tab.