Whenever I see threads like this, it reminds me of a short story I believe by Ray Bradbury. A soldier/military researcher invents a machine that can turn weapons into into dust, he brings it to his boss claiming it is a device that can save lives and stop violence. His boss laughs at him and says something along the lines of even if you destroyed every missile and gun, we’d come at each other with swords and axes, take away swords and axes, we’d come at each other with sticks and stones, take away sticks and stones, we’d come at each other with with punches and kicks, take away the limbs, we’d lay there spitting on each other. The researcher walks away but had activated his machine which turned his boss’s pen (which was made from spent shells) into dust. His boss, seeing this, tears off a leg of a chair and goes after the researcher.
Now with that out of the way, I find the premise of the question to be extremely silly. The NRA is simply a lobbyist group that supports private ownership of guns as given by 2nd Amendment Rights. Sure, they celebrate the gun owners who successfully defend themselves via use of firearm (like that single mother not too long ago who called 911 for “permission” [as some like to say] to shoot the man who was breaking and entering her home posing a threat to herself and her child) and use it as reason for gun ownership, but when you think about it, they don’t need to denounce shooters and use that as reason for regulating/banning guns when there are plenty of leftist persons, such as (I assume) yourself, who do just that. You already balance out the NRA and the like so why should they also hop on the bandwagon you’re already on?