I’m referring specifically to the titles that suggest activities that are illegal, and with good reason.
Not to discount your indignation to having that stuff come over your TV listing, IMO they are just titles. I am sure the content is nothing like the title in the since you are not having child actors in them. I can see no real difference than having a title that doesn’t show or express murder and killing and have the body count clock in at a dozen and a half before 15 minutes of the movie has aired. Be it an illegal sounding title, or action depicting illegal activity, IE, murder, heist, robbery, dope taking, etc. it is what it is. There are many things I would not want blaring through stereo speakers in my home or content on TV or within certain movies, but it will happen. The only way I can hopefully never encounter them is never watch TV or listen to any radio.
(generally) Daddy/daughter porn stars are not actually related. It’s simply an older man and a barely legal girl that play the roles of father and daughter.
If the younger actor is playing as if he/she is under 18 (the de facto legal age for Hollywood) what does that say about the masses; they will scream ”those perverts” from the street corner but tune in with the beer and popcorn when away from prying eyes. If there is a genre for that content there must be enough viewers to support it.
@jonsblond Sure, they will come across it eventually, as they grow older, but at 9 or 10 years old?
Don’t count on it being that late. If they are on a computer without Net Nannies, etc, simple innocuous words in a search and pull up porn content with no holds barred photos. A 7 year old today can pull up adult content you would not even find when I was that age even if you found your dad’s, uncle’s, etc stash of Playboys.
Do we really care if they do? Is there any certain way to know that any harm comes from watching porn at that early age? In spite of all of the studies done, I am not sure anyone can truly measure the impact it has on the child or society.