If you will read your own links with a critical and skeptical approach – which I heartily endorse – then you will see what nonsense they are.
One of the links only says that China has increased its “weather manipulation spending” by 19% ... which is to day, by $114,000,000. That might sound like a lot of money, and to you or me it certainly would be a lot, but in terms of government spending – even in China – that is a tiny drop in a big bucket. (They are reported to have spent around $40 Billion in and around Beijing to improve the city’s infrastructure and appearance for the Games. In terms of that kind of spending, $114 million is a rounding error.) What is the money spent on? (Aside from the attempted weather modification at the recent Beijing Summer Olympics, that is.)
Another of the links mentions what a “hugely controversial” topic this is. In terms of “climate”, yes, that is a controversial topic (because of so many lies spread for so long by so many whose funding depends on selling the lie), although “weather modification” is the nominal goal of anyone who believes in “anthropogenic global climate change” or “warming”, especially if they think that is a looming disaster. Aside from that, in one paragraph the story claims both “that it can have big local effects in amplifying drought or increasing floods” (which, of course, would be the opposite effect that is intended) and that the practice is “highly unreliable”. Well, which is it? Unreliable and not to be depended upon, or a practice that is so likely to cause harm? Nonsense. (Compare to “witchcraft” in terms of effectiveness, controversy and predictability.)
Another story (more than six years old) had a very specific claim: “The Chinese scientists say it worked — increasing rainfall during those years by 210 billion cubic meters, enough to meet the annual needs of 400 million people. China has a population of about 1.3 billion.” I find this highly specious. How can this claim be verified? This isn’t science at all; it’s very much related to all of the current “global climate change” hysteria: a lot of hype and melodrama and salesmanship to increase funding to someone’s pet project and little empire.