General Question

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

Do people truly weigh the facts or sort the reason before they react?

Asked by Hypocrisy_Central (26879points) May 6th, 2015
9 responses
“Great Question” (2points)

Thinking of another thread a Flutheronian (who due to the no-name policy cannot be given credit) had a bombshell of a concept, that when investigated closely seem to be what happens 92% of the time (I three that in to distract those who can’t follow the question to question the percentage). Do you believe that happened in relation to this man’s Instagram online blog? Are people really that reactionary?

Observing members: 0
Composing members: 0

Answers

Dutchess_III's avatar

I try to.

flutherother's avatar

1. Going on a road trip with your daughter. OK
2. Taking lots of photographs of her. OK
3. Taking pictures of her with no clothes on. I wouldn’t do it but borderline OK
4. Posting nude pictures of her online. Not OK

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

^ 3. Taking pictures of her with no clothes on. I wouldn’t do it but borderline OK
OK, before I assume, elucidate please

flutherother's avatar

As I say I wouldn’t do it. Why would you want to?

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@flutherother As I say I wouldn’t do it. Why would you want to?
As a record if all areas of their childhood I suppose, to show them nudity is not bad, (as many parent allude to these days), etc. How would taking pictures of your kids being them even when nude worse than taking your kids to a nudist beach, camp, or living in a nudist community where they may not be having their picture taken nude by their parents but having everyone else see them nude? I can’t see how that would be better. Just trying to learn a new understanding of that.

Pied_Pfeffer's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central, if you want to show your child that nudity is not bad, just walk around your abode naked. If your child wants to follow suit, so be it. Please just be aware of the laws of your land. More importantly, what if the child goes to a friend’s house to play and undresses? It’s going to raise an eyebrow or two.

I have photos of when a niece and nephew, both two at the time, snuck out during a family meal, stripped, and went outside to play in a sand hill surrounded by recently fallen rain. They are lovely and hysterical all rolled into one. Yet I don’t post them on the internet because they aren’t of me.

The kids are now adults. The plan is to scan the photos and share them with the two culprits. If they wish to post them on the internet, so be it. I just don’t feel that I have the right to do so without their permission.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@Pied_Pfeffer The plan is to scan the photos and share them with the two culprits. If they wish to post them on the internet, so be it. I just don’t feel that I have the right to do so without their permission.
I was addressing the taking of the pictures to be borderline OK. If they are borderline OK, by wording mean they are mostly not OK, to some alluding to nudity is bad. I do not think posting photos of your family, nude, sleeping, doing something embarrassing, etc. should not be done, and certainly without their permission. But taking pictures to share among family and very close friends that are like family should have no negative repercussion, unless somehow the mere fact of taking the photos are in some way terrible. Now I know people have different standards and then there is the law, but so long as no laws are violated, to say the mere taking of the pictures are bad, would by de fault point to being nude inn front of your kids would be a greater negative, or having them nude in front of virtual strangers at a nudist beach or resort, etc.

Dutchess_III's avatar

EDIT. Read the details next time, @Dutchess_III!

kritiper's avatar

For the majority, hell no. They just dive right in head first! Act first, think (?) later!

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

Mobile | Desktop


Send Feedback   

`