@kritiper The question doesn’t need to clarify because the word “normalcy” doesn’t originate with the question. The phrase “the new normal” came directly from Jenner herself, so it is her statement that we go to for clarity. As for the term, “normal” has always had two meanings: a descriptive meaning and a normative meaning. The descriptive meaning is statistical (something is normal in this sense when it is more common than not). The normative meaning is evaluative (something is normal in this sense when it is not regarded as shocking or distressing). And as I explained above, “the new normal” is an English idiom that uses the term normatively rather than statistically. As such, all protestations to the effect of “but it doesn’t happen a lot” have misinterpreted what Jenner is actually claiming.
As to the objection that it is too early to say that this is “the new normal” because not everybody is on board with it, I think you have too high of a standard for normalcy (in both the statistical and the evaluative sense). Normalcy does not require universality (whether it be universal adoption or universal acceptance). Not everyone is on board with interracial marriage, for example, but it seems patently absurd to suggest that society at large does not regard the practice as normal in the evaluative sense. Indeed, if we are holding out for universal adoption or acceptance, then nothing could be considered normal in the evaluative sense—which contradicts the data we started with (i.e., that society treats some practices as normal and other practices as abnormal).