@dopeguru You said, “The approach I’m suggesting is more world-mediated, mutual approach to education that considers people incomplete. This “authentic” approach to education must allow people to be aware of their incompleteness and strive to be more fully human”
What exactly do you mean? What does world-mediated mean? You said your “approach” is authentic. What does that mean? It makes no sense. How are other types of education not authentic? It doesn’t make any sense when you say that people need to “be aware of their incompleteness and strive to be more fully human.” What does that mean?
As far as I know, educated and uneducated people are all fully human. Really smart people, people of average intelligence, and people of very low intelligence, and even people who are in vegetative states are fully human. Care to explain what you mean?
On the same note, who are you to decide which people are complete or incomplete? What knowledge must they possess to be complete in your estimation? Do they need to be a genius in physics? Must they be able to shop for and cook a complete meal for a family of 4 on a daily basis? Must they be able to guide a son or daughter through a bout of online bullying? Must they be able to locate water if they live in an arid rural area? Must they be able to know what the opposite sex is thinking and choose a mate who doesn’t cheat on them? You tell us?