[Mod says] If an admin saw “Fox News” pop up in response to the site using a keyword, I’m thinking that would still not get Fox blocked. The average admin is bound to have heard of Fox News. Fluther, not so much. We are small enough to be a target – a site the admin hasn’t heard of will usually get banned, rather than checked out first.
Ideally, we would have no questionable terms in the title of any threads. Bendrew decided ages ago that the acceptable terms in titles are the clinical ones – words like “breasts” and “genitals” are often used in a medical context, so they will usually not be part of a company’s list of keywords. The same goes for terms like “fucked up” – this makes a lot of sense. Think of the false positives all over the internet.
Try to think like a computer. In your title, use terms which are likely to be used in an innocent setting. Clinical terms, whenever possible. If you need to, it’s fine to skirt around the question a little.
The details and answers inside a thread marked [NSFW] are up to you. We would remove anything that’s just obscene, but swearing and even explicit sexual terms are usually fine. If a user was to access those threads during work hours, Fluther would likely get blocked – but the alternative would be banning all sexual content everywhere on Fluther. I don’t think any of us want this. That’s why the compromise of [NSFW] is in place – we’re trying to make keeping Fluther off the blocked lists as easy as possible.