I think the question seems to have been somewhat lost at this point.
I would say this particular question posed in the original form does raise an interesting point. I mean, it basically seems to ask who’s controlling the forum. Because the truth is that if, say, the majority of flutherers were Muslim, and someone asked a “tough” question concerning religion, the responses would be quite in agreement and perhaps not allow for much open thought due to the fact that all were in agreement on the matter. Perhaps this would then allow the collective to be dominated by one view and thus represent something that is not of the highest quality, I suppose.
Take my question earlier posed on homosexuality and transexuality. You have to ask, who is controlling the forum? Now, if a wide range of beliefs are represented, and dialogue is open, you would hope that somewhere in the midst of that, you would end up with a “high quality” response. Yet, if say, the only sample of answers given are by a group of individuals who all share the same view, then it does not allow for quite as much discussion. It is true that this group could indeed be right in what they believe. However, diversity does seem to allow for a more open dialogue, and competing views and opinions, civilly discussed, can sometimes offer a more full response.
So again, you just have to ask, is any one alliance controlling the responses. I am sure many would hate it if Christians flooded this site and dominated conversation so much so that no other view could get through. But, on the other end, I am sure fluther would be happy to welcome some honest open dialogue from a Christian point of view, along with numerous other points of view when attempting to answer a question.