It’s an interesting question, and I’m not sure about how I’d answer… still, it gave me a thought… for the most part, the mini skirts/shorts women wear are made that short by manufacturers, where the pants men wear are made to be worn on the hips and guys push them lower on purpose…. in both cases the wearers are choosing fashion over comfort, but the fashion appears on the wearer by slightly different means.
It’s easier now that I’m shopping in women’s work clothes to find more conservative cuts—actually, it’s hard to find things that are short or skimpy in these sections—but when I was an adolescent with a mom who wanted me to wear shorts and skirts of a certain length or longer, it was difficult to find them in my age’s departments or stores. My mom would wind up relenting more often to a shorter-than-desirable length because there wasn’t anything longer. The story has been the same in the selection of casual college-age and mid-twenties fashion, and is especially noticeable when I compare the differences in cut between casual and workplace clothing. It’s possible to find longer lengths in casual, and it’s possible to find shorter lengths in workplace, but it’s not common.
At least, that’s what my understanding is/what my experience has been, but then, I’ve only really shopped for one gender. I know that male jeans vary in bagginess/skinniness, but that doesn’t force sagging? (At least where I am, guys can be seen sagging, or not sagging, any width of jean)... so I wasn’t of the impression that certain jeans are designed to sag, but maybe I’m mistaken.
I’m rambling—my main thought—it seems like the shortness of women’s skirts are (except when scissors are involved) determined by the manufacturers, where the sagging of men’s pants are determined by where they cinch or don’t cinch the belt. I’m not sure that that necessarily means anything significant—since both genders are exposed to pressures to look certain ways—it’s just interesting to me in my sleepy state…