In addition to the advice @Stinley has provided, I like to use Ulrichsweb: Global Serials Directory to identify journals that might be suitable places to publish my work. You should be able to find this database through your university library. It tells you if the journal is still active, whether it’s peer-reviewed and you can use keywords to identify titles.
Perhaps you could look at literary journals that publish scholarly content but are more fluid in terms of the structure. I agree with @Stinley, that not all journals will demand you follow a conventional format if your work draws on quality evidence and is of a high standard.
Are there scholars you admire who are producing papers similar to yours? Where are they publishing? It’s a case of finding your ‘tribe’. Have scholars who are working in your field and whose work you respect peer review your paper before you submit it to journals. That will give you an opportunity to ensure the paper is of a high standard before you submit it formally. Once you submit a paper to a journal, if the editor sends your paper out for formal peer review, you’ll receive guidance on how you can improve your paper. It’s up to you whether you accept or reject that advice. However, if editors reject your paper without peer review (or after peer review), you can also ask them to suggest alternative publications they feel might be a better fit.
The first step is for you to read papers from potential target journals to try to identify whether your work is going to fit. As @Stinley said, you want to publish in quality journals, but finding the right journal can take a bit of research and time. However, that initial scoping work can save time and disappointment in the long term. The peer review process for some journals can take a year or more.
Good luck!