@Hawaii_Jake
I suppose it depends on what one considers justice. To my view, I think of justice as restorative. Thus justice is really only achievable in cases where losses can be objectively measured and repaid. For example: I carelessly blow through a read light and smash into your car. You are fine, but your car is wrecked. In this case the damages can be measured. Your car can be repaired or replaced and you can be compensated for loss of wages (if you miss work because of having no car) and other related losses/expenses. You can be made whole, as it were. That’s justice the way I see it.
Now say I blow through the red light, smash into your car and you end up a paraplegic as a result. I can compensate you monetarily, but you cannot be made whole. No matter how much money you’re given in rightful compensation you still must go life in a diminished capacity. Your legs can never be restored. Justice, thus, is not really achievable, only recompense.
That’s my view of it anyway.