It depends. Like everything else in life, it always depends on context.
In a lifeboat situation – which the planet Earth is not, despite attempts to portray it as such – then, yes: everyone gets relatively equal rations (some can get more if they’re actually rowing the boat, standing watches, fishing, etc. – and that gets back closer to “normal life”, too).
But in the world that most of us inhabit every day where we aren’t actually starving, dying of thirst or about to be eaten by hungry tigers, etc., then “you get what you exchange for”. The world is a bottomless pit of need, and if that were the only criterion for “getting what you get – because you ‘need it’ ”, then who would ever work? Why should they? Even if they do work, why should they distinguish themselves? Why should they innovate, take risk, employ others in “regular wages” work, etc? If it’s all going to be earned to satisfy someone else’s need, then there’s no point to working any harder than anyone else, and we would soon achieve a common – but shared equally! – poverty.
No, thank you.