I have mixed feelings about making parents legally culpable or guilty of neglect when it comes to vaccinations.
As far as strep and ear infections, I think probably a doctor or social services probably could pursue a court order to treat the child if they became aware of the situation. Strep can lead to rheumatic fever ir rheumatic heart, which are both quite serious. Not to mention the first time I had strep I stopped swallowing my salivé it was so painful, and became severely dehydrated. I don’t mean I was thirsty, I mean medically diagnosed dehydrated. Ear infections can be very painful for young children and can lead to hearing loss. So, with this line of thinking I guess maybe legally requiring vaccination could follow a similar logic.
The thing is, most children are vaccinated, so herd immunity helps protect the population even though there is a small segment of children not vaccinating, Obviously, if too many refuse the vaccinations then we will lose herd immunity. Diseases like hepatitis and tetanus herd immunity doesn’t apply. However, I can’t fathom not vaccinating a child for tetanus.
If legal ramifications were pursued, I would be completely against legal consequences for not getting a flu vaccine. Currently, there isn’t even enough flu vaccine made each year for the entire population.