I’m just flabbergasted that the question was posted in the first place.
Sondland testified when questioned that Trump, when asked directly, said he wanted “NOTHING from Zelensky, no Quid Pro Quo” and that the only reason he had for thinking some kind of a trade-off was wanted in exchange for military aid. only his own assumptions.
So, your star witness, the only individual allowed to testify with actual contact with Trump and first hand knowledge, quoted Trump directly as saying he wanted NOTHING from Ukraine. no Quid Pro Quo, Yet that is your proof of guilt.
Then, even while claiming the moral high ground, you insult me with personal attacks about me and my childhood and parents. Your arguments, with reference to turds, and other skatological potty talk and vulgar insinuations, and your very real desire to overthrow our government and put an elected president in prison, shows how the ‘resistance’ has become a real psychopathic enemy force within this republic.
Be that as it may, your evidence of guilt is a proclamation that Trump said the opposite of what he’s accused of. How ironic, and how insane is that? The Sondland Torpedo sunk your own case. End of story.