Of course.
The future is not waiting to judge us for the choices we make today. It is merely waiting to be formed by the choices we make today.
Our only basis for choice is what we think is moral/reasonable at the moment we make it.
At this moment there seems to be only two choices.
One- Do nothing, let the virus run it’s course, kill some people, create some immune people, over power a medical treatment bureaucracy which will create social, political and economic stress, and deal with all that in the future. This would be the natural law approach.
It is not unreasonable.
And it would produce a particular future. Not necessarily bad.
Two- Do something. Attempt to confont the virus, and avoid the social, political and economic confusion that the natural law approach tends to do, but create social, political and economic confusion in it’s own fashion.
Post enlightenment, modern, techno-man is not satisfied with giving in to natural law. It seems primitive to us-whether or not it is a valid basis for choice.
So we feel we must do something, because we know we can do something.
And that is not unreasonable.
And it will also produce a particular future. Not necessarily bad.
It has been this way for millennia. And we are still here.