@Yellowdog I’d look into the Autopsy. I don’t mean to stir up drama here and I won’t argue (I am basing this off of what was released, nothing else), but the fact that they are unable to link what the officer did as an exact cause of death (no signs of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation) may be an issue. Also the fact that they say that he had underlying health issues + had something in his system
My point is—they have to prove that the officers actions are 100% what caused his death, and the autopsy seems to point towards the officers actions plus other factors—and that could be enough to get him off. for criminal cases you need as close to a 100% positive that this person killed this guy for sure (beyond reasonable doubt) or in this case, that the officers actions was the sole/main reason he died, which may not (ACCORDING TO THE AUTOPSY) be the case.
Again, I’m just saying this based off the autopsy, nothing else.
I do not like the cop. I think he’s a shitty cop.Terrible, horrible, all that.
I’m just saying that your comment of “There’s no way he will be found not guilty” is kind of wrong.
Also, I do not believe it is possible to not have a bias in a case like this…
There’s the debate that the autopsy is totally wrong, I get that. But for now, that’s what it says. Just please don’t get all mad at me, I want him in jail, but there may be a few hurdles to get past when/if it goes to trial and assuming this is the autopsy they use (the family is doing an independent one, may not get used), assuming this is what they use, if they don’t play their cards right he could get off.