Yes, I think so. At its core, philosophy is about analyzing and understanding arguments. Not arguments in the “your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries” sense (aka “argument as war”), but in the “reasons and evidence given to support a conclusion” sense (aka “argument as exchange”). And to do so, it uses intellectual tools such as logical analysis, conceptual clarification, and dialectical thinking.
Arguments are all around us all the time. Every time someone tries to convince us of something, they are presenting us with an argument. The quality of those arguments varies wildly, however, and philosophy is how we separate the good arguments from the bad. Whenever we evaluate an argument, we are doing—or at least attempting to do—philosophy (whether we realize it or not).
So while a lot of people focus only on the most abstruse questions of philosophy when assessing the discipline—all of which I think are worthwhile, even if they are not always valuable to the average person—the basic tools and skills that philosophy has to offer are of practical valuable to pretty much everyone. And while there may be other ways to master those skills and tools piecemeal, philosophy puts them all together in one place.