@crazyguy I think this might be less confusing for you if we use 24-hour time and translate everything into Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). This places all of the relevant events within a roughly six hour window on 9 January 2021 (since that day had already started relative to UTC) and produces the following timeline:
7:40 UTC: Plane goes down
10:17 UTC: FlightRadar24 reports the crash
10:38 UTC: CNN Indonesia reports the crash
11:11 UTC: CNN Indonesia posts a follow up story with statements from officials
11:28 UTC: The Associated Press reports the crash
11:29 UTC: Earliest possible time for the Fox News article you linked (see below)
13:28 UTC: CNN World starts posting live updates
The Fox News article you linked does not have a precise time stamp. It includes a tweet from the Associated Press, however, so it cannot have been written prior to that tweet. In the timeline above, I am extremely generous and assume that Fox News reporters are so skilled that they can write and post a report in one minute. To the extent that this is unrealistic, the time of the Fox News article must be pushed later in the day.
In any case, you say that you saw the article just before you posted this question at 5:30 Pacific Time (13:30 UTC). This would, of course, be around the same time that CNN World started posting its live updates (5:28 Pacific Time / 8:28 Eastern Time / 13:28 UTC). So while Fox might have posted its story before CNN World starting posting live updates, you actually have no evidence one way or the other. And in any case, the Fox News article was posted nearly an hour after the first CNN Indonesia report.
P.S. When @hello321 says “it wouldn’t have mattered if they did,” he means that you wouldn’t have reacted any differently because you do not form your opinions on the basis of things like facts and evidence. By saying “your (b) says it all,” you are conceding—perhaps unwittingly—this assessment of your mindset.