@KNOWITALL “As far as ‘seeming happy’ with this SC, I am glad that they recognize state rights, absolutely. But you and I have talked maybe twice so I wouldn’t assume anything about me, if I were you.”
I was basing my statement on this comment you made:
“None of us ever believed he was a devout Christian, so no. But look at our Supreme Court now. Words matter far less than actions.”
Maybe I’m misinterpreting your statement?
“Let’s stop with the fear-mongering and stick to facts.”
Fact: Justice Clarence Thomas is open to revisiting:
Griswold v. Connecticut— “the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction.”
Lawrence_v._Texas “was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that sanctions of criminal punishment for those who commit sodomy are unconstitutional.”
Obergefell v. Hodges “a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
This isn’t some hypothetical fear mongering or hyperbole. The SCOTUS has signaled where it wants to go next.