The rule is pounded into our heads in school: “Always start with an introduction in your papers”.
It seems to me this concept has been carried way too far.
For example if a meteor hit Los Angeles, this is how the LA Times would form their lede:
“Thelma Burgess was washing dishes in her Laurel Canyon kitchen when a bright light appeared in the distance….”

Reporters are trained to “come up with a story” to “make it personal to the reader”.
I say this training is overthought crap. Just get to the point.
We don’t need introductory crap. We don’t need hard facts to be written in a story-style narrative. It may please newsroom editors, but it doesn’t please readers.
What do you think?

Topics: general, news, English, writing, politics, magazines, technology, publishing, people, information, communication, social, media, events, editing, style, sociology, current events, community, journalism, rules, information architecture, newspapers, speech, Social Science, reporting, talk, networks, social studies, opinions, civics, zeitgeist, local, Journalists