
Does sheltering an incumbent candidate from debates and a competitive primary hurt or help the party's chances of winning the general election?
I’ve heard people argue, especially in the mainstream media, that it’s important to protect a candidate in the primaries and that having a vigorous primary fight ultimately weakens your side. I’ve also heard that an intense primary fight will result in the most battle-hardened candidate emerging who will be the best one to represent your party in the general election. Perhaps there are other ways to think about it?
Would the Democratic Party have had a better chance of beating Trump if they’d allowed Biden to debate in the primaries? to not have canceled the primaries and just outright declared Biden the winner without a vote as the DNC did in many states?
What are your thoughts? Obviously the recent debate is an inspiration for the question, but it’s intended to be a discussion that would apply more broadly as well.

Composing members: 0
