“I’m still not getting why this needs confirmation and why it seems to be so amazing. It wasn’t used as a campaign stunt and this kind of thing happens every day.”
Actually this speaks to “this” which speaks to the question not the posts as you just tried to claim.
“I’m still not getting why this needs confirmation and why it seems to be so amazing.”
So stand by it all you want.
I had just explained to you
“I actually do witness smaller acts of kindness daily and live my life doing them. It is what keeps me happy while I am unemployed going on a year and 3 months and having trouble with money and things at home. Helping others. I do know exactly what you mean.
I was, as you indicated, specifically referring to a politician being involved and to the inordinate sum of money, which, it seems, isn’t that much to some.”
and your reply:
“I actually do witness smaller acts of kindness daily and live my life doing them. It is what keeps me happy while I am unemployed going on a year and 3 months and having trouble with money and things at home. Helping others. I do know exactly what you mean.
I was, as you indicated, specifically referring to a politician being involved and to the inordinate sum of money, which, it seems, isn’t that much to some.”
was as if I didn’t understand what you meant. It is clearly your attempt to guide the topic of debate away from the fact that you point was invalid.
Was your attempt to get me to look with in myself as if I had problems, in reality an attempt to distract from the fact that your comments on this thread were mostly unnecessary? How long have you needed others to validate yourself?