Thanks for the suggestions people!
To clarify, he is SHOWCASING the work: http://studio365.ca/krupa.html
I got him to layout 2 back pages of the catalog (which I later retouched). However, I developed and sold through the concepts, sourced the flower pics, art directed the product shots, did all the photoshop assembly and retouching, did all the type, and prepped it for production—(I’ve worked my way up from production design/pre-press, so I work to production-ready files). Basically, I threw him a 2-page spread to keep him busy… does this warrant a feature portfolio piece in his (or anyone’s) book? Had he only put the spread he did on display, then perhaps I wouldn’t mind so much… but he’s showing one of the main images (which took me some time to put together in Photoshop—notice the reflections/shadows/blurs and pink of the flower reflecting on the ring—that was some serious clipping/feathering/retouching work!) as well as the cover, which again was my work (1 of 4 image concepts presented). Anyone savvy enough will notice that none of the other pieces look anything like that piece—which is probably why he’s using it. Apparently there’s a few more pieces on there that aren’t his. I was actually notified of the situation by other designers who are also claiming that their work is on his site.
We’re all counting on the company owner to take legal action (since the work he has up there is unauthorized and a breach of contract). But, who knows when that will happen.
Currently trying pressure tactics… so if you think what he’s doing is wrong, feel free to email him your opinion… his email addy is on his site through the link above.
Cheers, and thank you for your help.