@ABoyNamedBoobs03 You’ve left the realm of our conversation and moved to the topic of what “our responsibilities are to Africa,” using the set of contemporary morals that I’m arguing are not valid. When there are 20 billion on the planet and half of them are starving to death, there is going to be widespread, uncontrollable chaos and civil war and all because we fell victim to a completely new philosophy that says that we have a moral responsibility to import medicine and food onto a continent where the average female gives birth to 9 children in her lifetime.
When that day comes and our grandchildren are living in that world, it will be the lefty busy bodies, thinking we need to make sure Africans don’t kill each other, who will be responsible. I hold them responsible for it NOW and think that allowing people to kill each other now is a FAR more moral system than making sure that nobody dies, or thinking that we’re killing people who can’t feed themselves.
When is the last time an African nation sent peace keeping troops to some non-African war zone.
We’re not seeing the bigger, evolutionary picture but are instead allowing our policy and morality to be formed by images on our television. Lots of people are going to die. Lots of people are going to kill each other. I would just assume let nature takes its course as opposed to allowing the world to descend into that weltering chaos.