Machine translation and a great many funny examples - When can we expect better results for the automatic translation of text from one language (e.g. English) into an other?
Machine translation, sometimes referred to by the acronym MT, is a sub-field of computational linguistics that investigates the use of computer software to translate text or speech from one natural language to another. At its basic level, MT performs simple substitution of words in one natural language for words in another. Using corpus techniques, more complex translations may be attempted, allowing for better handling of differences in linguistic typology, phrase recognition, and translation of idioms, as well as the isolation of anomalies.
Current machine translation software often allows for customisation by domain or profession (such as weather reports) – improving output by limiting the scope of allowable substitutions. This technique is particularly effective in domains where formal or formulaic language is used. It follows then that machine translation of government and legal documents more readily produces usable output than conversation or less standardised text.
Improved output quality can also be achieved by human intervention: for example, some systems are able to translate more accurately if the user has unambiguously identified which words in the text are names. With the assistance of these techniques, MT has proven useful as a tool to assist human translators, and in some cases can even produce output that can be used “as is”. However, current systems are unable to produce output of the same quality as a human translator, particularly where the text to be translated uses casual language.
Would you like to share some funny examples when translating a foreign language text (snippet) into English?
Here’s my example:
In the transition is apparent that a married woman speaks. The type characterized this as old-fashioned husband. It is probably a ceremony in which the husband probably too much alcoholic punch drunk. Moreover, it is so nearsighted that without glasses, he did not see what is happening around him.
Topics:
Composing members: 0
Answers
)“Great Answer”
(3)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(2)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(1)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
