Ok, I wasn’t going to get into this, but I woke up this morning, specifically feeling bothered about some of the responses to this question, so…
@charliecompany34: Why do you say “she”? Are you implying that, for women, it should be considered “abnormal” and “freakish” to have a strong libido, but not for men?
@jonsblond: Are you serious? A kinky girl, the kind you don’t take home to mother? Last I checked, most moms don’t want to know the details of their grown children’s sex lives. Why should a sexual woman who expresses herself and is comfortable with her high sex drive and, perhaps, unique sexual preferences be treated as if she isn’t “girlfriend material”? It’s 2009 – shouldn’t people get over this idea that women are “supposed to be” shy, overly modest, missionary-only bores?! What the hell. I know it still exists, but this concept that some males have of wanting their wives/girlfriends to be reserved (and thinking that women who are more free with their sexualities are not “good enough” for mother) is really outdated and disturbing. This notion that, to be a respectable woman, one must be reserved with her sexuality, is absolutely insulting. There is no reason that a woman’s hypersexuality should deem her unworthy of a relationship.
I guess the biggest issue I had with your answer, jonsblond, is that it implied the male would enjoy this “kinky” girl as a fling, but that she would be unworthy of meeting his mother because of her sexuality.