I know nobody from fluther is trying to make me feel bad, but just the public message in general is that if you really love the gays, you’d welcome a parade with open arms… or legs. I don’t expect anyone to stifle who they are (to be less flamming in public). That’s not my issue with it. It’s the heightened sexual nature of it all. What gay people are like is not truly demonstrated in the parade. Few people wear their leather daddy outfits, go naked, and dance provocatively with the statue of David in a non-parade or club environment. It gives the wrong message altogether. If the parade promoted that they were normal people deserving of equality among the straight, I could see the point. But it’s more an event that people want to shield their children from, and what good does that do? That’s not educating anyone. I’m definitely not a prude, but the X rated displays I’ve seen in these things are completely unnecessary. I wouldn’t want to take a child to such an event, or someone I was wishing would be more accepting of gays; I would be more embarrassed. What message does that send? Maybe it’s just the one’s I’ve been to, who knows…
To be fair, I know people in the festivals are not all like this. There are people who are genuinely there to fight for equal human rights. I applaud those people immensely. There are great musicians and artists, too. If they reach only one person at the celebration, then it was worth it. :)
You didn’t discriminate… I just thought you were asking who was going to the one in LA.
I’m glad, too, that Obama is making an effort for gay support. Now, if he would just support gay marriage instead of denying it because of his religious beliefs, then we’d have a real progressive President.