I don’t know, but I think that you may be referring to the polarity of supply-driven economic model vs a demand driven one. The supply driven model states that if you supply the good, it will automatically bootstrap demand. Whereas it’s opposite, the demand driven model says that only those goods are produced which already have a demand in the market. Demand indicating both the will and ability to pay the good’s price.
Basically these are two economic schools of thought at opposite ends of the spectrum and most probably, the truth lies in the middle somewhere.
I think the argument can go both ways. If I am an environmentalist, I can say that if producers start producing solar powered cars and stop producing the cars they used to make, everyone will have no choice but to buy solar powered cars. Supply-driven economics, in other words.
There can be similar arguments for demand-driven products, issues.
But in my personal opinion, it’s really a circle. To me it’s a question of whether the chicken came before the egg.