@MrItty Good point; one thing I wish we did a better job of overall was to determine which products were greener overall, when production, distribution, and disposal methods are taken into account.
My thought on this is that there is as much or more machinery used to create the eReader as there are to create books. I’ve worked in book binderies and I’ve known numerous friends and family members that work in both the wood products industry (paper mills, logging, etc.) and the industries that create microchips and plastics used for stuff like eReaders. From what I’ve seen (as a non-expert on either industry), I would say the means of production is just as likely to be a wash in terms of environmental impact as it is to be overbalanced toward one or the other. If so, the product would remain the determining factor in which is the greener product.
And I’m not necessarily arguing that books are greener than eReaders. I only said it bothered me. And what bothers me mainly is that I don’t know which product is greener, so I can’t really make an intelligent decision either way. I would be interested in seeing some statistics that show which product is the greener product when production is taken into account with all products, including eReaders and books.