@mattbrowne why don’t YOU reply, while we’re here, instead of pointing out how much fucking profanity i use, as if i didn’t know already, and directing me to a database of canned, old as fuck responses that have been debunked to hell and back? If that’s the way you wanna play it just let me know me so i can point you to my database of canned debunkings and we can call it a day.
And for the record, the use of profanity doesn’t make my post any less sound in its logic, nor it makes it “less credible”, whatever the fuck that means (i mean, the comment is there, you can see it and you can’t believe it’s there? seriously, man, any other attribute i could’ve accepted: rude, snarky, sarcastic, ridiculing, whatever, but one thing’s for sure: the post is fucking there, and if i didn’t care i wouldn’t have posted it). Also, if you don’t like profanity, that’s your own fucking problem. /rant
Here’s a profanity free version for your apparently-still-not-ready-to-face-a-little-emphasis eyes:
What’s the point of considering the existence of something that, being completely untestable, and therefore having NO visible (visible, audible, etc… obviously) effect on reality, has no improtance at all as far as reality is concerned?
On a more constructive note your link in the post to chazmaz gives an error