@drdoombot I will answer with an analogy so that perhaps you understand both my point as well as the reasons I do not want this to become a debate where I will be automatically be attacked, no matter what I say.
There is a 2000-year-old story that says there was a guy called Jesus who suffered and eventually died on the cross to save Mankind. Some people don’t believe this story as true, but those who do, automatically become Christians and follow a certain religion.
Now over the years this religion wages wars in the name of Christ, the Crusades and N.Ireland (a favourite subject for the original asker) being just two characteristic examples. As a reaction to the violence sprung by Christianity, a lot of people have become atheists, while others openly accuse the religion. Does any of this mean that Jesus never existed, or that His Pathos was a hoax? No, but 2000 years later people are allowed to discuss other aspects and effects of the Pathos itself.
I believe the time has not yet arrived when we can discuss the implications of the Holocaust on world history. Or the way the real events have been exploited over the years for non-historical purposes. This in no way means that the Holocaust was a hoax, or that nobody ever died in a concentration camp. I think I was clear about that.
I am also not comparing the two events, I am just using an analogy about something that can be discussed, even among Christians, and something that can’t, even among Jews. Just so people don’t start saying things like “Jesus was a Jew” or “how could you compare the suffering of a God to the suffering of mortals?” or “how can you compare the suffering of One to the suffering of Many?” and all sorts of irrelevant comments.