@Beta_Orionis That is not specific. Good is an entirely subjective concept. Yours is not the only valid definition. Especially in an opinion-based context.
You have to be kidding. Ok, if you want to split hairs, go for it. A good photographer is pretty explicit to most people.
One could definitely approach photography the long and haphazard way that digital cameras enable, by snapping, until you find techniques that work and ultimately reach a point where excellent images are produced consistently sans precise or theoretical technical knowledge.
One could, but one would be pretty foolish. If you want to learn anything, you get training and experience, you don’t just blunder about hoping to eventually stumble into proficiency.
BTW, how many nicks are you posting under? Your first post using this one was DarkScribe Oh god… I knew that would happen. The questions were Not Directed Toward You.
…you were responding as though you were judochop. You aren’t – are you?