@OutOfTheBlue
Re the link you offered:
It was sounding almost like psychology (read: vague and widely applicable; not psychological) until all that spirit stuff. Then it reminded me of astrology.
I guess it’s not, like, irredeemable though. I wouldn’t say that. But its attempt at naming and expounding on the qualities of an artist that contribute to the production of good art – its attempt at that just seems kind of unnecessary or impossible. Like it said, a list of ‘CI’ qualities would be long and would vary from person to person. These are only vaguely defined (and probably not deeply researched) correlations.