Actually, I think @hghgbvvn asks an interesting question about the problem of observation – for us, it’s an epistemological problem, but for the cat it’s definitely not.
It’s easy to reformulate Schrödinger’s cat without the problem, though – the decay of a radioactive isotope could easily (in a conceptual sense) be set to fry an egg, or knock over a domino or cause any other event with non-conscious entities involved.
To return to the original question, which seemed to me to suggest some kind of common sense problem with the thought experiment (outside of the Copenhagen interpretation, which would poke us with a stick saying “it doesn’t matter anyway”) – it would seem to suggest some kind of rather strong idealism If we accepted both the wave-function interpretation of quantum physics and the reality of the cat’s experience.