Yes. Doubting climate change has nothing to do with wickedness.
Denying evolution is much harder because of 4 billion years of history that has left its mark. Comparative genomics confirms all the evidence. Unfortunately, climate is far more complex. There are only a couple of hundred really good climatologists in the world. A weatherman or woman having studied meteorology is normally not an expert climatologist. Drawing conclusions from a few winters or summers is downright silly. There are many open questions how our climate will be in 2050, but the dangerous signs are strong enough to apply the precautionary principle. We are pumping 100 million years worth of solar power into our atmosphere in a mere 100 years. Every chemist knows that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. The effect can be measured in every lab in the world.
I wonder why the climate change denier movement is much smaller in Europe. It seems to me that the US is very prone to all kinds of denial movements, not only evolution. They form quickly getting loads of funding. The vast majority of climatologists in Asia are also in consensus about climate change.
@lloydbird – If there was serious controversy, they would never have been a Kyoto protocol. And there would be no major conference in Copenhagen, Denmark next month.
It’s okay to have doubts, but it’s dangerous to listen to polemics. Videos titled “the climate change swindle” are in fact very polemic and downright foolish in the same way videos titled “the evolution hoax” are. Strong language is often a clear sign that there’s a hidden agenda. Don’t become a victim of it.