I use to work a part-time security job at a big, popular department store. they are now defunk. there was a big display of Bubble Blow on the corner of one aisle. apparently, some child had been blowing bubbles and left the top off of one bottle. someone unknown, hit the display of Bubble Blow with a shopping cart and the opened bottle of Bubble Blow fell on the tile floor of the store. this display was in an isolated section of the store. before the store had been notified of the hazardous situation, a customer came around the corner, slipped on the Bubble Blow and broke her knee cap. at first, you would think the store was liable. the court disagreed. the court stated that because of “upleading circumstances”, the store was not at-fault. i wonder how the court came to this decision?