Thanks for clarifying what concurrent sentencing means. I guess I am against it then. I think that if the crime or crimes is heinous enough, then each offence should be individually recognized and dealt with independently, for justice for the victims and families of the victims did I get it right this time?
For lesser crimes (i.e. crimes of money!), depending on the impact the crime has made, I would probably vote for on an “per case” basis on how I would feel about concurrent sentencing. I generally believe penitentiaries are overflowing with people who have committed (or just been convicted with) petty crimes, such as theft of a loaf of bread. I think if someone keeps stealing a loaf of bread, give him/her some food stamps, not permanent incarceration.