Not really. Most gene stock gives the latent capability to do just about anything. Our bodies change as a result of the stresses put on them. If you lift a lot of weights, the genes have instructions that tell the body what to do to handle this stress better. This works for just about anything.
If you start learning an instrument. Your body will respond to the stress, and you will gain more dexterity or lip strength or listening capability. You need it more, and your body has the instructions for this stuff built in.
Even intelligence is built in to pretty much everyone. If you put people in an environment where they are being asked to remember things and write things and do math or whatever, most people will respond by gaining skill in these things. Their minds will work better in terms of math and writing capabilities.
Talent is latent in all of us. All it takes to release it is proper training and desire on the part of the person to develop their talent.
It’s more complicated, though. When you think about how people choose mates, you realize they are seeking to combine their genes with the genes of someone who exhibits qualities (including talents) that are desirable. A reinforcing cycle develops. As people with, say, musical skills marry others, they create an environment that supports the development of the same skills in their children. This then encourages the children to seek mates with similar alleles, and on and on it goes.
This is why sons often take on father’s jobs. The ability to do that job is not just coded in that child’s genes, but the environment to help those genes express that ability is also there.
Genes and environment work hand in hand to reinforce each other and to concentrate abilities. Get rid of your idea of raw talent. Without appropriate upbringing, the latent capabilities your genes provide you will not develop into anything.