@JeffVader I think you misunderstood my last question I directed at you. I was asking if you think the psychics actually believe they have the powers they claim to have. I don’t want you to think I was accusing you of being nuts. But you did answer the question I asked afterwards.
@JeffVader @mattbrowne So now we have a couple points of discussion. Matt, you are saying it is only part fraud because they ascertain certain real facts about the subject through non-supernatural means. I think that is just a tool they use in their overall deliberate attempt to deceive the subject into believing they can tell them their future. It is advertised as a supernatural service, so I view it as total fraud.
Jeff, I agree with you that if they genuinely believe they have powers, then they aren’t intentionally fraudulent. However, they are actually selling a service they cannot provide. So the question is, while unintentional fraud seems less shitty than intentional fraud, does not intending to be frauds exonerate them from being classified as frauds? Supposing someone prosecuted the intentional fraud and unintentional fraud. Would/should the punishments be different? It would be really hard to ascertain whether or not someone is being truthful when they say they believe they have psychic powers.