If I thought about it longer, I might come up with some remakes I think are better than their originals. At best, I may just like some differently.
Two examples: I love the original “Ocean’s Eleven” because of Sinatra and the Rat Pack. The boys play it like they do all their movies, fast and loose. And though the plot is campy and silly, it’s fun. In the Clooney & Company remakes, the plots get into mission impossible territory (something I’m getting a bit tired of), but all the acting and dialog are great. The thing I like most about both the original and the remakes is the camaraderie among the guys.
Then there are the two “The Hulk” films. First time I saw the Bana version, I hated the CGI, the darkness of the scenes, and the over-the-top subplot about his father. I liked the remake better. All the exposition is done away with under the opening credits, and the story is – if this is possible – marginally more credible. The CGI is excellent, and though I think Norton is miscast, still, I like him in it.
However, I recently watched the original on DVD and found I like it much better this time. Looks like the digital geniuses have brightened all the dark scenes, and since in the years since I’ve become more familiar with Bana’s acting, I like his performance better than originally. I also like Jennifer C. much more then Liv T.
Oh, and @ucme, I totally agree about the Brando version of “Mutiney.” Too bad the critics were so brutal when it came out.
.